The Whakatōhea mandate inquiry report.
Material type: TextSeries: New Zealand. Waitangi Tribunal reports ; WAI 2662.Publisher: Lower Hutt, New Zealand : Legislation Direct, 2018Description: xiii, 114 pages: 23 cmContent type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9781869563295
- 1869563298
- KUQ716.7 .A15W144 no. 2662
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Te Taurawhiri Non-Fiction | Alexander Library | Te Rerenga Mai o Te Kauru Te Taurawhiri | Te Taurawhiri | 346.93 WAI | Available | T00811188 | ||
Te Taurawhiri Non-Fiction | Davis (Central) Library Te Taurawhiri | Te Taurawhiri | 346.93 WAI | Available | T00804835 |
Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:
The claimants were several Whakatohea groups, and they objected to the Crown's recognition of the Whakatohea Pre-Settlement Claims Trust's deed of mandate. That mandate was for the negotiation of Whakatoheas historical Treaty of Waitangi claims. The central complaint was that the Crown had breached the principles of the Treaty by failing to actively protect the claimants ability to exercise their rangatiratanga and decide for themselves how they would settle their historical claims. The report looks at whether the Crown's decision to recognise the claims trusts deed of mandate was fair and reasonable and made in good faith. The Tribunal found that the Crown had failed to act reasonably, honourably, and in good faith and had thus breached the Treaty principles of partnership and active protection
"WAI 2662."
"Previously released online in pre-publication format in 2018 as The Whakatōhea mandate inquiry report - pre-publication version"--Title page verso.
Includes bibliographical references.
"WAI 2662. The claimants were several Whakatōhea groups, and they objected to the Crown's recognition of the Whakatōhea Pre-Settlement Claims Trust's deed of mandate. That mandate was for the negotiation of Whakatōhea's historical Treaty of Waitangi claims. The central complaint was that the Crown had breached the principles of the Treaty by failing to actively protect the claimants' ability to exercise their rangatiratanga and decide for themselves how they would settle their historical claims. The report looks at whether the Crown's decision to recognise the claims trust's deed of mandate was fair and reasonable and made in good faith. The Tribunal found that the Crown had failed to act reasonably, honourably, and in good faith and had thus breached the Treaty principles of partnership and active protection"-- Publisher information.