Normal view MARC view ISBD view

I will be complete : a memoir / Glen David Gold.

By: Gold, Glen David, 1964-.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: London, England : Sceptre, an impring of Hodder & Stoughton, 2019Copyright date: ©2018Description: 500 pages ; 20 cm.Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 147362018X; 9781473620186.Subject(s): Gold, Glen David, 1964- | Authors, American -- BiographyGenre/Form: Autobiographies.DDC classification: 813.6 Summary: From the bestselling author of Carter Beats the Devil and Sunnyside, a shocking, big-hearted memoir about his bizarre upbringing in California in the 1970s and how he survived it.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due
Non-Fiction Davis (Central) Library
Non-Fiction 813 GOL Available

Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:

' I Will Be Complete is the best memoir I've read in years. It's likely the best memoir published in years.' Darin Strauss, author of Half a Life and Chang and Eng

From the bestselling author of Carter Beats the Devil and Sunnyside , a shocking, big-hearted memoir about his bizarre upbringing in California in the 1970s and how he survived it.

Glen David Gold grew up rich on the beaches of 1970s California, until his father lost a fortune and his parents divorced when he was ten.

Glen and his English mother moved to San Francisco, where she was fleeced by a series of charming con men and turned increasingly wayward. When he was twelve, she took off for New York without telling him, leaving him to fend for himself. On midnight streets and at drug-fuelled parties, wise-cracking his way through an alarming adult world, Glen watched his mother's countless, wild attempts to reinvent herself.

In this exceptional memoir, acclaimed novelist Glen David Gold captures his bizarre, lonely upbringing and how it shaped him as an adult with stunning insight and unsparing candour. Shocking, mordantly funny and achingly affecting, he tells an unforgettable story of the years he spent trying to rescue his mother - and his ultimate realisation that only by breaking free could he ever hope to be complete.

'The prose is crystalline, hard as real diamonds, flashing, revealing. The story is simple, just a boy and his mother's long disintegration, but the journey is darkly complicated, heartbreaking, beautiful as hell.' Mark Childress, author of Crazy in Alabama

From the bestselling author of Carter Beats the Devil and Sunnyside, a shocking, big-hearted memoir about his bizarre upbringing in California in the 1970s and how he survived it.

Excerpt provided by Syndetics

1. The Last Kings of San Francisco Address Unknown I think you're an adult when you can no longer tell your life story over the course of a first date. I might have gotten this idea from my parents, because they reinvented themselves so often. Their stories have odd turns which speak not of one life, but of many that don't seem to match up, and of choices you'd think no one would actually make. When I was twelve years old, I lived by myself for a while. This was the mid-1970s in San Francisco, so the rules were a little different then--and yet not so different that me living alone made much sense. When I describe what happened, people tend to ask, "But how did you end up so--" They dance around the word "normal," then realize it doesn't apply, and instead they say, "So nice?" I'm not nice. I'm polite. Nice is a quality and polite is a strategy. But I have ended up happy. Also, I've ended up something more unusual than that: autonomous. I have a good memory but lately I've been looking for people who might know more, and I come up empty. Life in the 1970s led to a lot of bad luck and unexpected consequences. Perversely, I'm relieved when I learn some people I wanted to talk to are dead. But then I find one man I don't actually want to: Peter Charming. He's almost invisible, but I'm good at research. He has no business licenses. He doesn't own property in his name. The house he lived in when I knew him turns out to have belonged to somebody else, and even his 1970s phone number is assigned to a different person in old directories. I can't find any criminal records, though those are difficult to get to the bottom of. The San Francisco Superior Court, however, provides some sheet music in a way and it's up to me to imagine the score. There are civil lawsuits. In some, he's the defendant and in others the plaintiff. One of them went on for seven years and struggled all the way to trial twice. There are ways the mind pushes back against knowing too much. You research too long. You obsess over irrelevant details. Your memories tend to come in snapshots without context. You amaze the world by how unfazed, how nice you seem. You discount cruelties as if they're anecdotes best brought out in a barroom competition. You also tend to say "you" when you mean "I." When I was a kid, Peter was bad to my mom. She managed to escape eventually, but at a cost. I don't know if the damage he inflicted upon her was worse financially or emotionally. In our family, money is a convenient cipher for the wounds that are harder to qualify. Accounting for his charisma and promises, you could reduce him to an elemental force that moved my mother and me forward, then backward, then apart. My mother is much more important, but when I think of looking directly at her I reflexively retreat into research. I would rather look into Peter's life again. People leave San Francisco but something always gets left behind. Usually it's gossip. I've mentioned his name to people who were in that social circle and it's like he never existed. I'm sure they met him and I don't think they're lying when they say they don't remember. He was of a time and a place that are gone. It's like asking about a statue in a park now the site of a high rise. What happened to that old bronze bust? Didn't you see it? His picture is in the society column of the San Francisco Chronicle in the late 1960s, and he looks young. He hasn't learned arrogance yet. Instead, he looks just shy of self-confident, asking the camera to confirm it sees him as handsome. He's an escort for women who are older. They have their own money, and my hunch is that when they stopped seeing Peter, they still had all of it, minus what they'd given him knowingly. That was before the 1970s, the time that was made for him. *** One person reacted to his name, once. At a party sometime in the 1980s, I met a novelist whom I knew by reputation--a happy bullshit artist in the way of those Beats who made careers and academic posts by riding out the ambiguity of whether they'd actually had Kerouac sleep on their couch. I was twenty-two and the novelist was in his sixties. He was talking to a beautiful woman who held her drink with both hands and who regarded him with suspicion, like he was about to offer her candy. As I was walking by, he brought me into the conversation, which I recognized as a gambit to make her reduce her grip on her glass to one hand, to let the other settle to her hip. "Excuse me," he said to me. "You look part English." "That's true." "Is the other part--Jewish? I ask that as a full Jew myself." "It is." "I've often thought the combination of English and Ashkenazi makes the most handsome man in the room. Don't you think so?" he asked the girl, who was noncommittal. "This fine woman," he said a moment later, "still hasn't decided to leave her husband for me, but I can't blame her." "The question is whether she's going to expand her horizons or let them stay as they are," I said. He started to say something he'd prepared but faltered. The conversation continued the way he was driving it as before, but his interest in her--obligatory as it already was--was complicated by this: I wasn't a chump. I'd been moderately funny but I hadn't tried to compete. I was staying in the conversation to make him look good. That's a set of skills that develops in unusual circumstances. After the woman left for better prospects, he wanted to know about me. "How did you come to San Francisco?" he asked. "My mother met a man at the Mark Hopkins Hotel." When that was all I said, he laughed. "What is it about the Mark Hopkins?" "She met a man who said he wanted to buy her a balloon and take her to Paris." I have to stop short my writer's memory, the desire to underline. I can't claim that he froze his wrist just as the drink was about to meet his lips. "I think I knew that man," he said. "You knew Peter Charming?" When he spoke again, it was with caution. "Do you know where he is, still? Are you friends with his people?" "No, not anymore." It was unnerving to see a man like the novelist, whose identity pivoted on tall tales, sweep my eyes with conviction to see if I was telling the truth. How would he know if I was sincere? He asked my mother's name, I told him, he squinted--vaguely, he thought he remembered her, but he wasn't sure. "Is your mother all right?" "No." "I'm sorry." I'm never sure what to say when people have to say that about her. Finally, he said, "Charming was doing terrible things." "I know." "You knew?" He looked alarmed. It was as if I were aware of atrocities but had done nothing. No, maybe not, I realized. "It was the seventies," he said, "and some of us fell victim to improving ourselves in ways that turned out silly . It was a silly decade. People took advantage of that. Charming was bad. I heard bad things." "Like what?" "White slavery." I'd seen some things but no, I hadn't seen that. I wanted the conversation to last longer, but another woman walked by, as pretty as the last, and in mid-sentence the novelist waved her down, introducing us. He told her I was his son. As I shook hands with her, he made up a biography for me, the spawn of his second marriage, I was out from Cleveland, I was on the crew team at my college, didn't I look just like him? As he spun the story I went along with it. He said my mother, his ex-wife, was English, and he felt that the combination of English and Ashkenazi Jew was the most handsome on earth. Hadn't he done right by me? Wasn't I a wonder? *** Later, I phoned my mother to tell her much of this conversation. I treated our talks back then like trips down hallways with certain rooms under lock and key, but I didn't think about why I was so careful. I told her about the novelist introducing me as his son, which she found delightful. I didn't say he'd asked if she was okay, or that I'd said she wasn't. "What did he say about Peter?" she asked. "He said Peter was involved in white slavery?" I rarely speak with that uptick. But I was asking a question as subtly as I knew how, not very subtly at all. What exactly were Peter's limits? She answered in a way that I would have said I felt nothing about. "Oh, Peter. You know, it was so hard to stay mad at him. He was like a big kid." And there it was, that statement I felt nothing about, remembered for decades when I have long forgotten the details of birthdays and first kisses. How did I really feel? I felt a dry, hot, constricting tension that I did not allow dominion over me. I felt like I wanted the conversation to be over so I could tell people about it and read from their faces how I should feel too. Might it be disturbing that my mother had suggested human trafficking was forgivable, if not childlike? I'm not asking that rhetorically; I'm looking for confirmation. I look to you, you nod, I nod back. "How do you feel, Glen, about a man you knew well perhaps being the worst sort of human being?" With pride in my voice at my own detachment, I would say, "Nothing," and upon your suggestion--probably unspoken, probably just a puzzled squint that I'm trained to look for--that someone more fully aware might feel something , I would think, "No, I'm too strong for that. Nothing can touch me." That reaction is what this story is about. For much of my life there has been a circuitous pathway between when something happens and when I react. This gives the illusion of stillness, when in fact it's about trying to accommodate too much at once. I do not have feelings so much as I gauge what a loved one would want me to feel, and then I tell myself about that. Perhaps that's familiar to you. Have you ever used a key on the lock of an old mountain cabin, felt it stick, and tried to imagine its teeth engaging tumblers? Have you tried making friends with its unknowable history, coaxing it into unfreezing, and have you promised you will not give in to a burst of anger that could snap it in half? Then you know what it is like to be my mother's son. It's exhausting and it's where art forms are born. I think Baroque draftsmen who made etchings of labyrinths were men raised by shattered women. Peter Charming is a part of the story, but really, I'm looking for my mother, or what remains of her. There is not going to be redemption here; nor am I going to indict her as a monster. There is another way to go for those of us who can no longer love our mothers. I have learned compassion for her, what an old friend calls "compassion from a distance." My mother's life has been a tragedy but mine has not. And let's be honest here. My mother isn't the story, either. I'd like to tell you about myself, which makes me want to apologize, the way my needing anything always does. I place a high value on autonomy. When I was so young that my memories were hardly even meant to be permanent, three or four years old, my parents and I were watching television. I saw actors talking to camera. It impressed my parents. They said there was something sophisticated in admitting that the scene had an audience. So, while I was hammering the flippers of my pinball machine, or sinking shampoo bottles in the bathtub as if they were my great-grandfather's U-boat, I began talking to camera myself. I knew it wasn't real, but it was also as vivid as the adventures I gave my stuffed kangaroo. When I was alone in a room, I was never alone, for there was an audience I was meant to entertain, and after I was put to bed, time and again my mother or father had to come into the room to tell me to be quiet, because I was still telling the events of the day to my invisible confederates, whom I loved for giving me a purpose. There was a rule I hewed to like it was superstition. In bed, lights out, I only had to talk until I'd described my day well enough that it felt true. There was a comforting assurance that if I told the story right, I could finally go to sleep. This feeling has never left me. Now, I tell myself that if what I say here is true, I will be complete and that is what I'm looking for, too. Excerpted from I Will Be Complete by Glen David Gold All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.

Reviews provided by Syndetics

Booklist Review

When Gold was just 12 years old, his mother left him alone in their San Francisco apartment while she took a spur-of-the-moment trip to New York with a new fling. Days later, his mother called and said he would be fine, to think of it as an adventure. As Gold outlines in this searching memoir, the emotional bruises of his unstable childhood would last as he began started to make his own way in the world and began a career as a writer. Following the chaos of his formative years, Gold developed a detachment from emotion that he once regarded as a superpower but later recognized as depression. He skilfully describes this process, from his early years living in a house that served as a showy monument to his father's fly-by-night wealth, through his six years going to college and working in bookstores, and his early struggles with relationships and his career. Years later, his mother would deny the New York getaway ever happened. But, in his memoir, Gold powerfully reclaims his own story.--Bridget Thoreson Copyright 2018 Booklist

Kirkus Book Review

A novelist and short story writer takes a stab at memoir."For years I didn't write this memoir because I wasn't sure of myself," writes Gold (Sunnyside, 2009, etc.) near the end. "I was waiting for a specific perception to cascade down and surround and I was hoping it would feel like radiance. Oh now I understand why my mother did that. I was waiting for the moment I would be a slightly better person." These perceptionsthe author's clear desire for insightful retrospectionfollow Gold throughout the book. He writes searchingly about the tenuous relationship with his mother that he fostered, watched decay, and eventually restored. Systematically, it seems, she loved and demoralized him at the same time. "I loved my father but I belonged to my mother," writes the author. This feeling of belonging and ownership would eventually come to define him. As he navigated through the hardships of social acclimation at Wesleyan University, in the workforce, and in his romantic life, Gold was constantly seeking a comfortable place in a world constantly in flux. But this struggle made him particularly insightful, and he offers consistently interesting takes on a variety of topics, specifically childhood and the process of maturation: "I was an anxious kid. I was born with a job. My parents told me they wanted to be parents so they could avoid the mistakes their own parents had made. I think they said this to let me know I was loved, but it made me feel pressure. I was going to have a better childhood. I wasn't sure what that entailed, but it suggested responsibilities." Gold delivers an engaging work of nonfiction that shows the author in a continuous battle to reconcile axioms with personal truths. As readers accompany him through his tumultuous relationships, unsuccessful jobs, or awkward interactions with his father, most will enjoy the ride.A strong memoir that oozes with the excitement of a life well-livedand well-analyzed. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.