Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Last hope island : Britain, occupied Europe, and the brotherhood that helped turn the tide of war / Lynne Olson.

By: Olson, Lynne.
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookPublisher: Brunswick, Victoria : Scribe Publications, 2017Description: xvi, 553 pages : illustrations ; 25 cm.Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 9781925322088; 1925322084; 9781911344063; 1911344064.Subject(s): World War, 1939-1945 | World War, 1939-1945 -- Governments in exile | World War, 1939-1945 -- Diplomatic history | Europe -- Politics and government -- 1918-1945DDC classification: 940.534 Summary: "When the Nazi Blitzkrieg subjugated Europe in World War II, London became the safe haven for the leaders of seven occupied countries--France, Belgium, Holland, Luxembourg, Norway, Czechoslovakia and Poland--who fled there to avoid imprisonment and set upgovernments in exile to commandeer their resistance efforts. The lone hold-out against Hitler's offensive, Britain became a beacon of hope to the rest of Europe, as prominent European leaders like French general Charles De Gaulle, Queen Wilhelmina of Holland, and King Haakon of Norway competed for Winston Churchill's attention while trying to rule their embattled countries from the precarious safety of 'Last Hope Island'"--Provided by publsher.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due
Non-Fiction Davis (Central) Library
Non-Fiction 940.534 OLS Available
Non-Fiction Gonville Library
Non-Fiction 940.534 OLS Available

Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:

When the Nazi blitzkrieg rolled over continental Europe in the early days of World War II, the city of London became a refuge for the governments and armed forces of six occupied nations - Belgium, Holland, Luxembourg, Norway, Czechoslovakia, and Poland - who escaped there to continue the fight. So, too, did General Charles de Gaulle, the self- appointed representative of free France. As the only European democracy still holding out against Hitler, Britain became known to occupied countries as 'Last Hope Island'.

In this epic, character-driven narrative, acclaimed historian and New York Times -bestselling author Lynne Olson takes us back to those perilous days when the British and their European guests joined forces to combat the mightiest military force in history and restore order to a broken continent.

' Last Hope Island is a book to be welcomed, both for the past it recovers and also, quite simply, for being such a pleasant tome to read ... Certain of these refugee groups have had their stories told before ... but Olson's book is the first to weave this all together ... It's a well-written and well-illustrated book, and deeply researched.'
- The Washington Post

'In a series of compelling books in recent years, Lynne Olson has established herself as an authoritative and entertaining chronicler of perhaps the largest single event in human history - the Second World War. Now comes Last Hope Island , a powerful and surprising account of how figures from Nazi-occupied Europe found Great Britain an essential shield and sword in the struggle against Hitler. This is a wonderful work of history, told in Olson's trademark style.'
- Jon Meacham, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of American Lion

'Lynne Olson is a master storyteller, and she brings her great gifts to this riveting narrative of the resistance to Hitler's war machine. You will be thrilled and moved - and enraged, saddened, and shocked - by the courage and steadfastness, human waste and stupidity, carelessness and nobility, of an epic struggle. Last Hope Island is a smashing good tale.'
- Evan Thomas, New York Times bestselling author of Being Nixon

Published in Australia and United Kingdom by Scribe 2017.

Includes bibliographical references (pages 517-525) and index.

"When the Nazi Blitzkrieg subjugated Europe in World War II, London became the safe haven for the leaders of seven occupied countries--France, Belgium, Holland, Luxembourg, Norway, Czechoslovakia and Poland--who fled there to avoid imprisonment and set upgovernments in exile to commandeer their resistance efforts. The lone hold-out against Hitler's offensive, Britain became a beacon of hope to the rest of Europe, as prominent European leaders like French general Charles De Gaulle, Queen Wilhelmina of Holland, and King Haakon of Norway competed for Winston Churchill's attention while trying to rule their embattled countries from the precarious safety of 'Last Hope Island'"--Provided by publsher.

Excerpt provided by Syndetics

Chapter 1 "Majesty, We Are at War!" Hitler Invades Norway On a chilly April night in 1940, leading officials of the Norwegian government were invited to the German legation in Oslo for the screening of a new film. The engraved invitations, sent by German minister Curt Bräuer, directed the guests to wear "full dress and orders," which indicated a gala formal occasion. But for the white-­tie, bemedaled audience seated in the legation's drawing room, the evening turned out to be anything but festive. Horrific images filled the screen from the film's beginning: dead horses, machine-­gunned civilians, a city consumed in flames. Entitled Baptism of Fire, the movie was a documentary depicting the German conquest of Poland in September 1939; it portrayed in especially graphic detail the devastation caused by the bombing of Warsaw. This, Bräuer said after the screening, was what other countries could expect if they dared resist German attempts "to defend them from England." Appalled by the harrowing footage, Bräuer's guests were puzzled as to why the German diplomat thought it necessary to show the movie to them. What could any of this have to do with peaceful, neutral Norway? Four nights later, just after midnight, those same officials were awakened by urgent phone calls informing them that several ships of unknown origin had entered the fjord leading to Oslo. A sea fog blanketing the fjord made it impossible to identify the ghostly armada's markings. Within minutes, however, the mystery of their nationality was solved when reports of surprise German attacks on every major port in Norway and Denmark began flooding Norwegian government offices. Aboard the German heavy cruiser Blücher, General Erwin Engelbrecht, who commanded the attack force heading for Oslo, reviewed his orders with his subordinates. In just a few hours, more than a thousand troops, equipped with minutely detailed maps and photographs of the Norwegian capital, were to disembark from the Blücher in Oslo's harbor. Their assignment was to slip into the sleeping city and storm government buildings, the state radio station, and the royal palace. Before noon, King Haakon, Crown Prince Olav, and the rest of the royal family would be under arrest and the Norwegian government under German control. A band, also on board the Blücher, would play "Deutschland über Alles" in the city's center to celebrate Germany's triumph, while German military officials took over administration of the country and its two most important material assets--­its merchant marine and its gold. When a Norwegian patrol boat spotted the flotilla and had the temerity to issue a challenge, the boat was machine-­gunned and sunk. Farther up the fjord, two small island forts, alerted by the patrol boat, also fired on the ships, but the heavy fog made accurate sighting impossible and the vessels swept on untouched. Shortly before 4 a.m., the convoy approached Oscarsborg Fortress, an island stronghold built in the mid-­nineteenth century and Oslo's last major line of defense. The Blücher's captain was as unperturbed by the sight of the fortress as he had been by the pesky patrol boat. On his charts and maps, Oscarsborg was identified as a museum and its two antiquated cannons described as obsolete. The maps and charts were wrong on both counts. The fortress was operational, and so were the old cannons, fondly called "Moses" and "Aaron" by their crews. The fog lifted a bit, and as the darkened silhouettes of the ships came into view, a searchlight on the mainland suddenly illuminated the Blücher. Moses and Aaron erupted at point-­blank range, their shells crashing into the 12,000-­ton heavy cruiser. One shell smashed into the Blücher's bridge, destroying its gunnery and navigational controls, while another slammed into a storeroom filled with aviation fuel. Shore batteries also began firing. Within seconds, the Blücher was ablaze, the flames leaping high into the air, burning off the fog, and lighting up the snow-­covered banks of the fjord. With a great roar, the ship's torpedo magazine exploded, and less than an hour later, the Blücher, commissioned only seven months before, rolled over on its side and sank. Nearly one thousand men went down with her, including most of the elite troops assigned to capture the royal family and government officials. General Engelbrecht was one of the several hundred survivors who escaped the burning oil covering the fjord's surface and swam frantically to shore. Throughout that day--­April 9, 1940--­Hitler's audacious, meticulously planned invasion of Denmark and Norway had gone almost exactly as planned. By early afternoon, virtually all the Führer's major objectives along the 1,500 miles of Norwegian coastline had been taken--­all, that is, except Oslo, the political, economic, and communications center of Norway and the key to the operation's eventual success. At 1:30 a.m. on April 9, the man atop Germany's most wanted list of Norwegians was awakened by his aide-­de-­camp. "Majesty," the aide said urgently, "we are at war!" The news came as no surprise to King Haakon VII. He had been expecting--­and dreading--­it for years. In 1932, he had told the British admiral Sir John Kelly, "If Hitler comes to power in Germany and manages to hold on to it, then we shall have a war in Europe before another decade is over." Hitler had come to power, but Norway's political leaders had ignored the king's repeated urging to strengthen the country's shockingly weak defenses. Like other Scandinavian nations, Norway had long since abandoned its bellicose Viking heritage: peace, not war, was deeply rooted in its psyche. Norwegians had little admiration for military heroes, of whom their country, in any case, had few. Much more esteemed were the winners of the Nobel Peace Prize, chosen annually by the Norwegian parliament. "It was very difficult to be a military man in prewar Norway," noted one of the few army officers on active duty in April 1940. In the late 1930s, this seagoing country's navy had only seventy ships: its two largest were the oldest ironclads in the world, affectionately called "my old bathtubs" by the naval chief of staff. The tiny Norwegian army, armed with vintage rifles and cannons, had no submachine or antiaircraft guns. The cavalry was supposed to be equipped with tanks, but the money appropriated by the government was so infinitesimal that only one tank had been purchased, "so that Norwegian soldiers could at least see one sample in their lifetime." Field maneuvers had not been held for years--­they had been abolished as a way of saving money--­and many brigade commanders had never even met their men. Norway's military vulnerability, however, was of little concern to its government leaders. The country had been at peace for well over a century, had successfully maintained its neutrality during World War I, and intended to remain neutral in the future. Money should be spent on social reforms, Norway's leaders believed, not on building up the military. In the view of most Norwegians, "war was the kind of thing that happened in other parts of the world," noted Sigrid Undset, a Norwegian novelist who won the 1928 Nobel Prize in Literature. "How many of us had ever seriously believed it could happen in Norway?" Having made a close study of Hitler, including reading Mein Kampf in the early 1930s, the sixty-­seven-­year-­old king was far less sanguine. If war broke out, his peaceable northern kingdom, though militarily defenseless, would have great strategic importance. Facing Britain to the west, it provided a gateway to the North Atlantic. To the south, it had access to the Baltic Sea and the German coast. Not least, it controlled the northwest sea route through which iron ore from Sweden was shipped to Germany, the ore's main customer. And then there was Norway's far-­flung merchant marine fleet, a glittering prize for Hitler or any other belligerent. But whenever Haakon raised these and other points, government leaders disregarded them--­and him. Most Norwegian officials scorned the monarchy as a useless relic of a bygone age and believed it should have no influence in government matters. Many thought there should be no monarchy at all. As much as he loved Norway, Haakon sometimes felt unwelcome there, at least in government circles. Not infrequently, he felt like the foreigner he once had been. Until he became king of Norway, Haakon VII, the second son of the crown prince of Denmark, had barely set foot in the country. He did not learn to speak Norwegian until the age of thirty-­three, shortly before his reign began. Known as Prince Carl in Denmark, he had been a modest, unassuming young royal who grew up believing he would never be king of anything, for which he was profoundly grateful. His mother had reportedly pressured him to marry the young Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands, but he had resisted, wanting nothing to do with the pomp and formality of official court life. Instead, he wooed and won his first cousin Maud, the sports-­mad daughter of King Edward VII of Britain, who was as anxious for a quiet life, out of the limelight, as he was. At the time of his marriage, Carl, who sported a tattoo of an anchor on his arm, was an officer in the Danish navy and planned to make it his career. But in 1905, Norway's declaration of independence from Sweden turned the life of the sailor prince upside down. The century-­old union between the two countries had never been an equal one: Sweden, whose kings ruled both nations, had been the dominant partner from the beginning, and Norway had been growing increasingly restive. To lessen the chance of forceful Swedish opposition to their peaceful rebellion, Norwegian leaders said they would welcome a junior member of Sweden's royal family as the country's new monarch. Prince Carl, whose maternal grandfather was the king of Sweden and Norway, was the obvious choice. The prince, however, was appalled at the idea. Not only did he want to remain in the Danish navy, he knew virtually nothing about Norway and its people. He was also acutely aware that many citizens of Norway, which had abolished its aristocracy in the nineteenth century, were in favor of a republic, not a monarchy. Under heavy pressure from his father-­in-­law, Edward VII, among others, he finally agreed--­but only if Norway held a referendum on the issue. When 88 percent of the electorate voted for a monarchy, Carl was crowned, taking the ancient Norwegian royal name of Haakon. (His wife, English to the core, refused to renounce her given name: she was known as Queen Maud until the day she died in 1938. She continued, as she always had done, to address her husband as Charles, the Anglified version of Carl. "I actually have plans to make him completely English," she confided to her diary early in their courtship.) With Haakon as monarch, Norway boasted the most egalitarian kingdom in the world. Sir Frederick Ponsonby, an aide to Queen Maud's father, once said that Norway was "so socialistic that a King and Queen seemed out of place." After a visit to Oslo in 1911, Theodore Roosevelt wrote to an acquaintance that the insertion of a royal family into the most democratic society in Europe was like "Vermont offhandedly trying the experiment of having a King." Haakon, who frequently described his position as that of "a very democratic president for life," was known to his people as "Herre Konge" ("Mr. King") rather than "Your Majesty." The royal family lived simply, with Queen Maud often doing her own shopping. In his frequent tours of the country and travels abroad, Haakon impressed those he met with his friendliness and wry sense of humor. Once, at a gathering of the British royal family at Windsor, he noticed a youthful distant cousin of his, Lord Frederick Cambridge, standing awkwardly by himself in a corner. He marched over and vigorously shook the young peer's hand. "You don't know me," he said. "Let me introduce myself. I'm old Norway." As close as he was to his British relatives and as much as he loved their country, Haakon was horrified by the refusal of Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's government to confront Hitler over his repeated aggressions in the 1930s. After World War II began in September 1939, Norway, like other neutral European countries, made clear that it wanted no part of a military alliance with a nation that, along with France, had handed over much of Czechoslovakia to the Führer and then, having declared war against Germany for invading Poland, had failed to do anything to aid the Poles. "All the small nations now understand that we in the future have to look after ourselves," Haakon wrote chidingly to his nephew, Britain's King George VI. Until the spring of 1940, the war was a conflict in name only. Chamberlain and most officials in his government had no interest in and no intention of fighting a real war. They had imposed an economic blockade against Hitler and seemed to think that this would be enough to bring him to his knees. Winston Churchill, Chamberlain's first lord of the admiralty and the British Cabinet's only bellicose member, strongly disagreed with Chamberlain's "phony war" strategy. From the war's first day, he demanded that Britain take the offensive against Germany--­but not on German soil. The confrontation, he said, should come in the waters of Norway. He repeatedly urged the British government to stop the shipment of Swedish iron ore, vital to Germany's armament industry, along Norway's coastline. When both Norway and Sweden protested that idea, Churchill was infuriated by their reluctance to become battlefields for the warring powers. "We are fighting to re-­establish the reign of law and to protect the liberties of small countries," he told the War Cabinet (a claim that both Poland and Czechoslovakia might have found hard to stomach). "Small nations must not tie our hands when we are fighting for their rights and freedoms. . . . Humanity, rather than legality, must be our guide." After hesitating for months, Chamberlain finally gave in to Churchill's pressure. At dawn on April 8, 1940, British ships began sowing mines along the Norwegian coast. Hitler, who weeks earlier had said he would forestall any British move on Norway, had already ordered his high command to implement carefully prepared plans for the following day's surprise attack and occupation of both Norway and Denmark. In most respects, Germany's land, sea, and air assault on the two Scandinavian countries was a brilliant success. Before it began, Hitler had decreed that the kings of Norway and Denmark must be prevented from escaping "at all costs." In Copenhagen, the Germans had no trouble finding King Christian X of Denmark, Haakon's sixty-­nine-­year-­old brother, who capitulated as ordered. But bad weather and the sinking of the Blücher had upset the split-­second timing of the assault on Oslo. When German troops finally entered the royal palace, government buildings, and the Bank of Norway that afternoon, they found only frightened low-­level government employees and piles of papers burning in furnaces and fireplaces. The bank vaults lay empty, with no trace of the country's gold bullion. The king and government leaders had vanished, too. Excerpted from Last Hope Island: Britain, Occupied Europe, and the Brotherhood That Helped Turn the Tide of War by Lynne Olson All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.

Reviews provided by Syndetics

Library Journal Review

In her latest offering, best-selling author Olson (Those Angry Days; Citizens of London; A Question of Honor) revisits World War II history, a topic of several of her previous works. The author once again focuses on the intersections between war and politics, this time with an emphasis on the exile governments situated in London during the conflict. Olson's main argument is that cooperative wartime exile helped many European leaders form connections and networks with one another that would not have been possible in more distant circumstances. These relationships laid the foundation for such political and economic developments as the Benelux Treaty and the European Union. Olson's work is well-researched and well-written, weaving together personal narratives of many prominent Allied leaders with political intrigue and wartime developments. VERDICT Recommended to readers with an interest in World War II, political science, European history, and 20th-century history.-Crystal Goldman, Univ. of California, San Diego Lib. © Copyright 2016. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

Booklist Review

*Starred Review* This is a history book that reads like the best thrillers. Olson, who has often written on the period before WWII (Those Angry Days, 2013), has clearly utilized her knowledge and prior research well. England, the island of the title, was home to several of Europe's exiled leaders Charles de Gaulle, King Haakon VII of Norway, Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands and private citizens and soldiers (the airmen of Poland, leaders of Czechoslovakia, and the Free French) during WWII. Focusing on these exiles, Olson offers a fascinating view of the war and its aftermath, less from a military than from a high-level civilian perspective. The well-demonstrated incompetence of British intelligence (especially in light of its diametrically opposite reputation) and its military and civilian leaders occasionally lends the astute writing an almost comic perspective. The narrative jumps from London to the Continent, where British cooperation with the Resistance in various countries had much to do with the Allies' victory, and this is carefully recounted. The many individuals are finely drawn, major developments (breaking of the Enigma code, D-Day, the Battle ofArnhem, the crucial contribution of the BBC) are well covered, and the book provides an unusual and very insightful angle on the war.--Levine, Mark Copyright 2017 Booklist

Kirkus Book Review

A "rich, intensely human story" of European cooperation during World War II.Early on during the war, government officials and many citizens of a host of conquered European nations fled to Britain. Bestselling historian Olson (Those Angry Days: Roosevelt, Lindbergh, and America's Fight Over World War II, 1939-1941, 2013, etc.) writes a vivid history of the war through the eyes of the exiles and compatriots left behind. She reveals inspiring tales of heroism, suffering, and sacrifice without ignoring too many incidents of betrayal, missed opportunities, and incompetence. First to arrive were the Poles and Czechs. That Britain had betrayed Czechoslovakia to Hitler in 1938 and remained passive while the Wehrmacht conquered Poland in 1939 did not lessen their commitment. Their military units fought with the Allies, and their prewar intelligence skills were far superior. The brilliant Bletchley Park decoders could not have succeeded without the earlier innovations of Polish codebreakers. In 1940, leaders from conquered Norway, Denmark, Belgium, and Holland formed exile governments. Though no significant French political figures came to Britain, Winston Churchill encouraged the obscure brigadier general Charles de Gaulle. Olson reminds readers that, until late 1942, none of this activity greatly inconvenienced Hitler or his plans. Britain's victory (really a draw) in the Battle of Britain was followed by a numbing series of blunders and defeats. Joining the resistance was suicidal; even military buffs will recoil at the murderous ineptitude of early British secret operations. By 1943, however, the Allies had gotten their act together. Their armies were advancing, and the resistance was functioning efficiently. Feel-good histories of World War II have fallen out of fashion, but Britain's sole stand against Hitler remains inspiring. Despite the title, the occupied nations that she sheltered did not "turn the tide," but Olson delivers an engrossing, sometimes-disturbing account of their energetic efforts. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.