The Ngāpuhi mandate inquiry report.
Material type: TextSeries: New Zealand. Waitangi Tribunal reports ; Publisher: Lower Hutt, New Zealand : Legislation Direct, 2015Description: xvi, 96 pages ; 23 cmContent type:- text
- unmediated
- volume
- 9781869563172
- Ngā Puhi mandate inquiry report
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Te Taurawhiri Non-Fiction | Alexander Library | Te Rerenga Mai o Te Kauru Te Taurawhiri | Te Taurawhiri | 323.119 WAI | Available | T00801252 | ||
Te Taurawhiri Non-Fiction | Davis (Central) Library Te Taurawhiri | Te Taurawhiri | 323.119 WAI | Available | T00602437 |
Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:
"The Ngapuhi Mandate Inquiry Report is the outcome of an urgent Waitangi Tribunal inquiry into 15 claims submitted by Ngapuhi groups (including hapu and hapu collectives) concerning the Crown's decision to recognise the Tuhoronuku Independent Mandate Authority as having secured a mandate to enter negotiations with the Crown to settle the historical claims of all Ngapuhi. The claims alleged that the Crown's decision was flawed and reflected its desire to settle all Ngapuhi historical Treaty claims through a single settlement process regardless of the preferences of Ngapuhi hapu. They argued that, in recognising the mandate secured by the Tuhoronuku Independent Mandate Authority, the Crown had failed to actively protect the ability of Ngapuhi hapu to exercise their rangatiratanga in determining when and how they would settle their claims"--Publisher information.
Previously issued online as a preliminary version.
"WAI 2490"
Includes bibliographical references.
"The Ngāpuhi Mandate Inquiry Report is the outcome of an urgent Waitangi Tribunal inquiry into 15 claims submitted by Ngāpuhi groups (including hapū and hapū collectives) concerning the Crown's decision to recognise the Tūhoronuku Independent Mandate Authority as having secured a mandate to enter negotiations with the Crown to settle the historical claims of all Ngāpuhi. The claims alleged that the Crown's decision was flawed and reflected its desire to settle all Ngāpuhi historical Treaty claims through a single settlement process regardless of the preferences of Ngāpuhi hapū. They argued that, in recognising the mandate secured by the Tūhoronuku Independent Mandate Authority, the Crown had failed to actively protect the ability of Ngāpuhi hapū to exercise their rangatiratanga in determining when and how they would settle their claims"--Publisher information.